The spanish environmental impact assessment system: our position in the world

Authors

  • J. M. Martí­nez Orozco Dpto. Ingenierí­a Civil. Universidad Europea de Madrid. Madrid (España).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2006.v58.i504.315

Keywords:

enviromental impact assessment, Spain, comparative review

Abstract


This paper presents the results of an evaluation of certain aspects of the performance of the Spanish Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system. For this purpose, parallels between the EIA system in Spain and in other countries have been established. The study is based on a comparative review of the EIA systems currently in force in 55 countries. A set of performance indicators was developed and applied to the assessment of these EIA systems. The results reveal that the Spanish EIA system is in a peculiar situation in the international arena, which is explained by the combination of major shortcomings and some advantages in EIA practice. Spain is one of the World’s largest “producers” of EIAs, and one of the industrialized countries that least legislative ammendments has introduced to remedy deficiencies in EIA practice. Many of these deficiencies still remain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Fundación Entorno: Empleo y formación en el sector del medio ambiente en España. Fundación Entorno, Madrid, 2000.

(2) Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Estimación del empleo ambiental en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 2000.

(3) Wood, C.; Barker, A.; Jones, C. y Hughes, J.: Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process. EIA Centre, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, UK, 1996.

(4) Martínez-Orozco, J. M.: Análisis del funcionamiento de la evaluación de impacto ambiental. Tesis Doctoral. Dpto. Proyectos y Planificación Rural. ETSI Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 1997.

(5) Hernández, S.: La legislación de evaluación de impacto ambiental en España. Mundi- Prensa, Madrid, 2000.

(6) Commission of the European Communities: Report from the Commission of the Implementation of Directive 85/337/EEC and Annexes for all Member States, COM (93) 28, Volume 13. CEC, Brussels, 1993.

(7) Wagner, D.: Concise Revision of the Report from the Commission of the Implementation of Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment. Update 1995/96. Stadt- und Regionalplanung Dr. Paul G. Jansen. Köln, 1997.

(8) Commission of the European Communities: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC as Amended by Directive 97/11/EC). COM (2003) 334 final. CEC, Brussels, 2003.

(9) Martínez-Orozco, J. M.; Aramburu, M. P. y González Alonso, S.: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Screening Stage in EIA.

(10) Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1998. European Commission: Workshop Report: Public Participation and Consultation in EIA and SEA. p. 23. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.

(11) Land Use Consultants: Environmental Impact Assessment: A Study of Costs and Benefits. Final Report. CEC, Brussels, 1996.

(12) Cherp, A.: “Environmental assessment in countries in transition: Evolution in a changing context”, Journal of Environmental Management, 62 (2001), 357-374. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0438PMid:11505763

(13)Cherp, A.: “EIA legislation and practice in Central and Eastern Europe and the former USSR. A comparative analisis”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(2001), 335-361. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00078-6

(14) World Bank: Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Europe and Central Asia Countries. 55 pp. Europe and Central Asia Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Department, World Bank. Washington D.C., 2002.

(15) Nafti, R. y George, C. (eds): Working together to manage the environment: strengthening EIA systems in the Mediterranean Region. Mediterranean Environment Protection Technical Assistance Program (METAP), The World Bank, Washington D.C, 2003.

(16) CENN: Proceedings on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Legislation and Practices in the Caucasus Countries. Caucasus Environmental NGO Network (CENN). Kobuleti, Georgia, 2002.

(17) Aguilar, G.: Evaluación de impacto ambiental para Centroamérica. Desarrollo económico y evaluación de impacto ambiental. 64 pp. Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Oficina Regional para Mesoamérica. Moravia, Costa Rica, 2003.

(18) Espinoza, G. y Alzina, V. (eds.): Revisión de la evaluación de impacto ambiental en países de América Latina y el Caribe. Metodologías, Resultados y Tendencias. 93 pp. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo y Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile, 2001.

(19) Almeida, K.: Cadre institutionnel législatif et réglementaire de l’évaluation environnementale dans les pays francophones d’Afrique et de l’Océan Indien: Les indicateurs de fonctionnalité, les écarts fondamentaux et les besoins prioritaires Essai de typologie. 103 pp. (20) Institut de l’Energie et de l’Environnement de la Francophonie & Secrétariat Francophone de l’Association Internationale pour l’Evaluation d’Impacts. Collection Évaluations Environnementales, 1. Montreal, Canada, 2001 .

(21) Bekhechi, M. y Merder, J. R.: The Legal and Regulatory Framework for Environmental Impact Assessments. A Study of Selected Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. 153 pp. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank, Washington D.C., 2002.

(22) Southern African Institute for Environmental Impact Assessment: Environmental Impact Assessment in Southern Africa. 352 pp. Southern African Institute for Environmental Impact Assessment, Widhoek, Namibia, 2003. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia: A Study on the Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment in Selected ESCWA Countries. 62 pp. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, United Nations, New York, 2001.

(23) Komatsu, K.: “Current Situation on Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in SoutheastAsian Countries”, en IGES Forest Conservation Project. A Step toward Forest Conservation Strategy(1). Interim Report. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, 1998, pp. 17-21.

(24) Tan, A.K.: “Environmental Laws and Institutions in Southeast Asia: A Review of Recent Developments”. Singapore Yearbook of International Law, VIII (2004), 177-192.

(25) Sadler, B.: Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice and Improve Performance. Final Report. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Hull, Québec, 1996.

(26) Ortolano, L.; Jenkins, B. y Abracosa, B.: “Speculations on when and why EIA is effective”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7 (1987), 285-292. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(87)90002-3

(27) Wood, C.: Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. 331 pp. Longman Harlow, Essex, UK, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2006-12-30

How to Cite

Martí­nez Orozco, J. M. (2006). The spanish environmental impact assessment system: our position in the world. Informes De La Construcción, 58(504), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2006.v58.i504.315

Issue

Section

Research Articles