Comparativa del cálculo de pandeo en métodos basados en la sección eficaz

Manuel J. Freire Tellado

doi:10.3989/ic.2000.v52.i467.706

Comparative of the buckling calculation in methods based in efficacious section

Authors

Manuel J. Freire Tellado Arquitecto. Dpto. de Tecnología de la Construcción. Univ. de La Coruña

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2000.v52.i467.706

Abstract

This paper analyzes the results obtained from the buckling calculation methods for masonry structures proposed by Eurocode EC-6, NBE-FL-90, Lahuerta and EHE-98, in orden to discuss the results derived from Eurocode EC-6. At the beginning, various relevant elements and parameters of each formulation are described and the values proposed for these methods are compared. This analysis leads lo several suggestions. The system used to homogenize the results obtained by the different methods is explained -in order to be able to compare results. Finally the calculation results of each method are plotted and various graphics are drawn. The comparison of a significant number of situations does not show a clear winner: the dispersion of results is verified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2000-06-30

How to Cite

Freire Tellado, M. J. (2000). Comparative of the buckling calculation in methods based in efficacious section. Informes De La Construcción, 52(467), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2000.v52.i467.706

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 467 (2000)

Section

Research Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.

All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.

Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.