Análisis del comportamiento sísmico de construcciones rurales tradicionales de piedra: estudio de caso de una estructura de un piso

Autores/as

  • C. Arcidiacono University of Catania
  • S. M. C. Porto University of Catania
  • G. Cascone University of Catania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.039

Palabras clave:

Verificación sísmica, fuerzas coplanarias, estructura tipo pórtico (shear-type), mampostería de piedra, normas sísmicas, modelación, reutilización

Resumen


Las características específicas de las construcciones rurales tradicionales pueden tener influencia en la verificación de su comportamiento sísmico. Cuando se hace necesario cambiar el uso de las construcciones rurales tradicionales, los trabajos de reestructuración deben satisfacer las normas sísmicas específicas y, al mismo tiempo, deberían preservar sus peculiaridades originales. En este artículo se ha aplicado un modelo para verificar la seguridad sísmica de mamposterías sujetas a acciones coplanarias, con el objetivo de ahondar en el comportamiento estructural de construcciones rurales tradicionales de una sola planta, hechas con mampostería de piedra, con relación a la aplicación de normativas y posibles trabajos de mejora antisísmica. Los resultados han demostrado que los mecanismos de colapso de los elementos resistentes y el método de simulación del comportamiento de los tímpanos de mampostería tienen influencia en la verificación sísmica, así como la necesidad de efectuar obras de refuerzo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

(1) Robinson, G.M. (1991). EC agricultural policy and the environment: land use implication in the UK. Land Use Policy, 8(2): 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(91)90002-Z

(2) Di Fazio, S. (1999). Rural architecture of Europe, the ECOVAST strategy. Bliss o Blitz?. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Rural Buildings in Ulster. Belfast: UAHS - Ulster Architectural Heritage Society.

(3) Fuentes, J.M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(2): 119-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.004

(4) Candura, A., Dal Sasso, P., Marinelli, G. (June, 2008). Recovery and Reuse of Rural buildings: the Spread Out Building case. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Invited Overview, Vol. X, No. 3.

(5) Dal Sasso, P., Caliandro, L.P. (2010). The role of historical agro-industrial buildings in the study of rural territory. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(3): 146-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.003

(6) Fuentes, J.M., Gallego, E., García, A.I., Ayuga, F. (2010). New uses for old traditional farm buildings: The case of the underground wine cellars in Spain. Land Use Policy, 27(3): 738-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.002

(7) García, A. I., Ayuga, F. (2007). Reuse of abandoned buildings and the rural landscape: The situation in Spain. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4): 1383-1394, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.23627. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.23627

(8) Porto, S.M.C., Leanza, P. M., Cascone, G. (2011). Developing interpretation plans to promote traditional rural buildings as built heritage attractions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14(5): 421-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jtr.869

(9) European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. (2005). Council Regulation (EC), n. 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development.

(10) Blasquez-Martinez, R. (1997). Enfonque y avances conceptuales de la nueva norma espa-ola de construcción sismorresistente NCSE-94 (Basic principles and conceptual advances of the new Spanish seismic code NCSE-94). Informes de la Construcción, 48(447): 39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.1997.v48.i447.974

(11) CEN. (2004). ENV 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: Comite Europeen de Normalisation.

(12) CEN. (2005). ENV 1998-3 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels: Comite Europeen de Normalisation.

(13) Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation. (February 4, 2008). Ministry Decree 14.01.2008. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Official Gazette of the Italian Republic. n. 29, suppl. ord. n.30. Rome

(14) Magenes, G. (September 3-8, 2006). Masonry building design in seismic areas: recent experiences and prospects from a European standpoint. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, paper number: keynote address K9. Geneva, Switzerland.

(15) Mele, E., De Luca, A., Giordano, A. (2003). Modelling and analysis of a basilica under earthquake loading . Journal of Cultural Heritage, 4(4): 355-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2003.03.002

(16) Cascone, G., Arcidiacono, C. (2001). Sulle condizioni di collasso degli edifici agricoli tradizionali per forze sismiche perpendicolari alle pareti (Failure conditions for seismic forces perpendicular to the walls of traditional agricultural buildings). Rivista di Ingegneria Agraria, 1: 37-45.

(17) Cascone, G., Arcidiacono, C. (2007). Definizione di un metodo di verifica per forze sismiche complanari alle pareti di edifici agricoli tradizionali (Definition of a safety verification method for in-plane seismic forces of traditional agricultural buildings walls). Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 38(2): 39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jae.2007.2.39

(18) Parisi, F., Augenti, N. (2012). Seismic capacity of irregular unreinforced masonry walls with openings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(1):101-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2195

(19) Briassoulis, D. (2000). Finite element analysis of a cylindrical silo shell under unsymmetrical pressure distributions. Computers and Structures, 78(1-3): 271-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00069-9

(20) Vidal, P., Guaita, M., Ayuga, F. (2005). Analysis of Dynamic Discharge Pressures in Cylindrical Slender Silos with a Flat Bottom or with a Hopper: Comparison with Eurocode 1. Biosystems Engineering, 91(3): 335-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.012

(21) Cascone G., D'Emilio, A. (1999). Definizione di un algoritmo per il calcolo delle strutture a tendone per vigneto. Rivista di Ingegneria Agraria, 1: 1-11.

(22) Briassoulis, D., Mistriotis, A. (2010). Integrated structural design methodology for agricultural protecting structures covered with nets. Biosystems Engineering, 105(2): 205-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.10.010

(23) Pinto, P.E. (2005). The Eurocode 8-Part 3: the new European Code for the seismic assessment of existing structures. Asian J. Civil Eng (Building and Housing), 6(5): 447-456.

(24) Borri, A., De Maria, A. (2009). Eurocode 8 and Italian Code. A Comparison about Safety Levels and Classification of Interventions on Masonry Existing Buildings. In: Eurocode 8 Perspectives from the Italian Standpoint Workshop (pp. 237-246). Napoli: Doppiavoce.

(25) Binda, L., Saisi, A. (2005). Research on historic structures in seismic areas in Italy. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 7(2): 71-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pse.194

(26) Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation. (September 23, 2005). Ministry Decree 14.09.2005. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, n. 222, suppl. ord. n.159. Rome.

(27) Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation. (February 26, 2009). Newsletter of 02.02.2009 n.617. Istruzioni per l'applicazione delle «Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni» di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008. Italian Official Gazette Rome, n. 47, suppl. ord. n.27.

(28) Porto, S.M.C., Cascone, G. (2013). A Building Characterization-Based Method for the Advancement of Knowledge on External Architectural Features of Traditional Rural Buildings. Informes de la Construcción, 65(532): 481-496.

(29) Augenti, N., Parisi, F. (June 28 - July 2, 2009). Non-linear static analysis of masonry structures, 13th Italian Conference on Earthquake Engineering (ANIDIS 2009). In Proceedings of the 13th Italian National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (ANIDIS 2009), paper n. S4.01. Bologna, Italy. PMid:9542375

(30) Beolchini, G.C., Grillo, F. (September 29 – October 2, 1991). La Normativa italiana e le vecchie costruzioni abruzzesi in muratura di pietrame (The Italian Standards and the old stone masonry buildings of Abruzzi). In Proceedings of the 5th National Congress on 'L'ingegneria sismica in Italia', (pp. 1253-1262). Palermo.

(31) Binda, L., Penazzi, D., Mirabella Roberti, G., Baronio, G., Tedeschi, C., Tiraboschi, C. (October 20-23, 1999). Indagini per la caratterizzazione dei materiali (Analyses for material characterization). In Proceedings of 9th National Congress on 'L'ingegneria sismica in Italia'. Torino.

(32) Liberatore, D., Gambarotta, L., Beolchini, G.C., Binda, L., Magenes, G., Cocina, S., Lo Giudice, E., Scuderi, S. (October 20-23, 1999). Tipologie edilizie in muratura del Comune di Catania (Masonry building typologies in the Municipality of

(33) Liberatore, D. (2000). Progetto Catania: indagine sulla risposta sismica di due edifici in muratura (Catania Project: a survey on the seismic response of two masonry buildings), (275 pp). Roma: CNR - Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti.

(34) Fusier, F., Vignoli, A. (1993). Proposta di un metodo di calcolo per edifici in muratura sottoposti ad azioni orizzontali (Proposition of a computational method for masonry buildings subjected to horizontal actions). Ingegneria sismica, (1): 10-24.

(35) Magenes, G., Bolognini, D., Braggio C. (2000). Metodi semplificati per l'analisi sismica non lineare di edifici in muratura (Simplified methods for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings), (99 pp). Roma: CNR - Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti .

(36) Cioni, P. (October 13-15, 1993). Valutazione della rigidezza dei maschi murari per una corretta ripartizione delle azioni orizzontali negli edifici in muratura ordinaria (Evaluation of wall panel stiffness for a correct distribution of horizontal actions on unreinforced masonry buildings). In Proceedings of the 6th National Congress on 'L'ingegneria sismica in Italia', (pp. 531-536). Perugia.

(37) Ministry of public works. (July 21, 1981). Law 14 May 1981, n.219, art.10, 'Istruzioni per l'applicazione della normativa tecnica per la riparazione ed il rafforzamento degli edifici danneggiati dal sisma', Newsletter of July 30, 1981, n. 21745,: Italian Official Gazette, n. 198. Rome.

(38) Dolce, M. (1991). Schematizzazione e modellazione degli edifici in muratura soggetti ad azioni sismiche. L'Industria delle Costruzioni, 25: 44-57 (in Italian).

(39) Calderoni, B., Cordasco, E. A., Lenza, P. (2007). Il ruolo della fascia di piano nel comportamento sismico degli edifici in muratura (The role of the spandrels in the seismic behaviour of the masonry buildings). Ingegneria Sismica, Year XXIVn. 1: 26-40.

(40) Cascone, G., Di Fazio, S., Arcidiacono, C. (13-16 June, 1994). Recupero degli edifici rurali tradizionali in zona sismica. Materiali, tecniche costruttive e tipi di intervento. In Proceedings of the IV Seminar of the AIGR second section on 'Il recupero dell'edilizia rurale nel contesto territoriale', (vol. 3, pp. 723-734). Sassari.

(41) Augenti, N., Parisi, F. (2013). Assessment of unreinforced masonry cross sections under eccentric compression accounting for strain softening. Construction and Building Materials, 41: 654-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.039

(42) Moreno-González, R., Bairán, J.M. (2011). Seismic performance analysis of the masonry buildings, typical of the Eixample District of Barcelona. Informes de la Construcción, 63(524): 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.045

(43) Mas-Guindal Lafarga, A. J. (1996). Criterios de intervención y recomendaciones de dise-o a sismo en la estructuras de patrimonio histórico (Criteria for intervention and recomendations on seismic design in structures of the historical heritage). Informes de la Construcción, 48(443): 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.1996.v48.i443.1002

(44) Fuentes-Pardo, J. M., Ca-as-Guerrero, I. (2003). Study and Characterization of Vernacular Buildings in Rural Areas. Processing and Management of Data. Informes de la Construcción, 55(487): 13-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ic.2003.v55.i487.544

(45) Barbari, M., Monti, M., Rossi, G., Simonini, S., Sorbetti-Guerri, F. (2014). Proposal for a simple method of structural calculation for ordinary earthen buildings in rural areas. Journal of food, agriculture & environment, 12(2): 897-903.

Publicado

2015-03-30

Cómo citar

Arcidiacono, C., Porto, S. M. C., & Cascone, G. (2015). Análisis del comportamiento sísmico de construcciones rurales tradicionales de piedra: estudio de caso de una estructura de un piso. Informes De La Construcción, 67(537), e053. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.039

Número

Sección

Artículos