How simple can nonlinear finite element modelling be for structural concrete?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.085Keywords:
Structural concrete analysis, non-linear finite element modelling, shear critical beams, support zone, dappedend beamsAbstract
This paper discusses on the required level of simplicity for suitable modelling of structural concrete. Traditional equilibrium- based approaches (as strut-and-tie models) are too coarse in some cases, as they account for the cracking state of concrete in a sometimes excessively simplified manner. The alternative of complex nonlinear numerical modelling is also not always satisfactory for design as the number of parameters required, their definition and the sensitivity of the structural response to them is complex and requires a high level of experience. Contrary to these approaches, this paper introduces the elastic plastic stress field method. This method is grounded on the theory of plasticity but allows considering deformation compatibility. The results are consistent both in terms of the strength and deformation field of the member. It also has the advantage of requiring only two physical material properties (modulus of elasticity and plastic strength) which can be easily determined by designers.
Downloads
References
(1) Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A. (2007). On development of suitable Stress Fields for structural concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 104(4): 495-502.
(2) Muttoni, A., Kostic, N., Fernández Ruiz, M. (2008). Discussion on Factors affecting strength of elements designed using strut-and-tie models, paper by Sergio F. Brena and Micah C. Morrison. ACI Structural Journal, 105(2): 233-235.
(3) Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A. (2008). Shear strength of thin-webbed post-tensioned beams. ACI Structural Journal, 105(2): 163-172.
(4) Rupf, M., Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A. (2013). Post-tensioned girders with low amounts of shear reinforcement: shear strength and influence of flanges. Engineering Structures, 56: 357-371.
(5) Campana, S., Fernández Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A. (2013). Behaviour of nodal regions of reinforced concrete frames subjected to opening moments and proposals for their reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 51: 200-210.
(6) Kostic, N. (2009). Topologie des champs des contraintes pour le dimensionnement des structures en béton armé (PhD Thesis). Lausanne : École Polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.
(7) Muttoni, A. (1990). Die Anwendbarkeit der Plastizitätstheorie in der Bemessung von Stahlbeton (Institut fu.r Baustatik und Konstruktion). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5598-3
(8) Vecchio, F.J., Collins, M.P. (1986). The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal, 83(2): 219-231.
(9) Leonhardt, F., Walther, R. (1963). Schubversuche an Plattenbalken mit unterschiedlicher Schubbewehrung. En Deutscher Ausschuss fu.r Stahlbeton, No. 156. Berlin: Vertrieb durch W. Ernst & Sohn.
(10) Sorensen H.Ch. (1974). Shear tests on 12 reinforced concrete T-beams. En Deutscher Ausschuss fu.r Stahlbeton, DTU Report No. R 60.
(11) Kuchma, D., Kang, S.K., Nagle, Th.J., Sun Sh., Hawkins N.M. (2008). Shear tests on high-strength prestressed bulb-tee girders : strengths and key observations. ACI Structural Journal, 105(3): 358-367.
(12) Kaufman, M.K., Ramirez, J.A. (1988). Re-evaluation of the ultimate shear behavior of high-strength concrete prestressed I-beams. ACI Structural Journal, 85(3): 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284314608
(13) Yoon, Y.S., Cook, W.D., Mitchell, D. (1996). Minimum shear reinforcement in normal, medium, and high-strength concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 93(5): 576-584.
(14) Vecchio, F.J., Shim, W. (2004). Experimental and analytical reexamination of classic concrete beam test. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(3): 460-469.
(15) Hong, S.G., Kim, D.J., Kim, S.Y., Hong, N.K. (2002). Shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams with end anchorage failure. ACI Structural Journal, 99(1): 12-22.
(16) MacLeaod G. (1997). Influence of concrete strength on the behaviour of bridge pier Caps (Master Thesis). Montreal (Quebec), Canada: McGill University.
(17) Shave J.D. (2005). Shear assessment of concrete bridges: anchorage effects and use of plasticity (PhD Thesis). UK: University of Bath.
(18) Herzinger, R., Elbadry, M. (2007) Alternative reinforcing details in dapped ends of precast concrete bridge girders. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2028: 111-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2028-13
(19) Nagrodzka-Godycka, K., Piotrkowski, P. (2012). Experimental study of dapped-end beams subjected to inclined load. ACI Structural Journal, 109(1): 11-20.
(20) Barton, D.L., Anderson, R.B., Bouadi, A., Jirsa, J.O., Breen, J.E. (1991). An investigation of strut-and-tie models for dapped beam details, Report No. 1127-1. USA: Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation.
(21) Werner, M.P., Dilger, W.H. (1973). Shear design of prestressed concrete stepped beams. PCI Journal, 18(4): 37-49.
(22) Madar, D. J. (1990). Detailing dapped ends of pretensioned concrete beams (Master Thesis). Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
