Comparative analysis of slabs foundation: lightweight by expanded polystyrene blocks opposite solid slabs

Authors

  • J. M. Dávila Universidad de Huelva
  • J. C. Fortes Universidad de Huelva
  • L. Crespo Universidad de Huelva
  • C. A. Rodríguez Universidad de Huelva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.157

Keywords:

Lightened slab foundation, expanded polystyrene, finite elements, settlements, lightening material, differential settlements

Abstract


The objective of this article is to confirm the different behavior of the traditional slab foundation against a lightened, making a comparative analysis, using the MEF, of the first solution with a lightened slab using expanded polystyrene (EPS) blocks, joining solid areas on pillars with grating beams. Therefore there are two top and bottom plates covering the EPS blocks. The results obtained allow assert ourselves that in situations of soft soils, with possible problems of settlements, the proposed solution has significant advantages by reducing them a percentage will vary depending on specific conditions. Besides this, it reduces significantly the differential settlements between supports, so this alternative has a more uniform behavior, as well as constructive advantages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Espel, R., Gomez, J., Grima, R., Aguado, A. (2009). La evolución de la construcción del Templo de la Sagrada Familia. Informes de la construcción, 61(516): 5-20.

(2) Lin, L.K., Chen, L.H., Chen, R.H.L. (2010): Evaluation of Geofoam as a Geotechnical Construction Material. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(2): 160-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:2(160)

(3) Negussey, D., Huang, X. (2006). Modulus of Subgrade Reaction for EPS Geofoam. En Proceedings of GeoShanghai International Conference 2006, (pp. 165-172). Shanghai. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40866(198)21

(4) Miao, L., Wang, F., Han, J., Lv, W., Li, J. (2013). Properties and Applications of Cement-Treated Sand-Expanded Polystyrene Bead Lightweight Fill. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 25(1): 86-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000556

(5) Braja, M. Das. (2010). Principles of Foundation Engineering (7ª edición). Cap. 5. Boston, MA (USA): Cengage Learning.

(6) Qiu, B. Li, Z. (2007). Discussion on design method of raft foundation. Shanxi Architecture 2007.

(7) Torrijo, F. J. (2010). Cimentaciones: alternativas de formulación al CTE, (pp. 11-15). Barcelona: Colegio Oficial de Geólogos - Delegación de Catalu-a.

(8) Grupo Forel. http://www.forel.es/sistema_constructivo_cimentur.php. Sistema Cimentur, cimentaciones aligeradas.

(9) Valdbjørn, T. (2010). Integrated Strip Foundation Systems for Small Residential Buildings. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 4: 39-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874836801004010039

(10) Negussey, D. (2007). Design parameters for EPS geofoam. Soils and Foundations. Japanese Geotechnical Society, 47(1): 161-170.

(11) Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Sun, J., Li, C. (2007). The new super element on the interactional analysis of frame structure and Winkler foundation beams. Sichuan Building Science.

(12) Ranjan, R., Sekar, P., Krishnan, P. (2011): Raft foundation on flexffile base for compact transmission line. Power Engineer Journal, 13(2): 19-24.

(13) He, C., Cai, J. (2006): Grillage Beams on elastic foundation analized by a semi-analytical and semi-numerical method. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 28(6): 761-766.

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

Dávila, J. M., Fortes, J. C., Crespo, L., & Rodríguez, C. A. (2015). Comparative analysis of slabs foundation: lightweight by expanded polystyrene blocks opposite solid slabs. Informes De La Construcción, 67(538), e080. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.157

Issue

Section

Research Articles