Back analysis of the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction from the monitored behaviour of diaphragm walls of Seville’s Underground

Authors

  • P. Arozamena Geotecnia y Cimientos, S. A.
  • A. Jaramillo Universidad de Sevilla
  • C. Oteo Catedrático Ing. del Terreno. Asistente Honorario Univ. de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.148

Keywords:

Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, retaining wall analysis, elasto-plastic springs, Rido, Cype, inclinometers, Seville’s Underground

Abstract


This paper presents an abacus with the values of the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction for retaining wall analysis in Seville. The aforementioned values have been extrapolated from the actual behaviour on site of the retaining walls, monitored with inclinometers, during the different excavation stages. A primary analysis is carried out initially using the calculation programs Plaxis, Rido and Cype and Chadeisson values of the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction. The comparison and discussion of the achieved results leads us to conclude that the usual calculations with Rido and Cype are not reliable for accurately predicting the actual behaviour of the retaining walls. Due to that a parametric analysis is carried out, varying the values of the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, until finding those which mach better the measured reality. The obtained results are synthesised in an abacus so that the knowledge learnt through experience can be applied in future works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Winkler, E. (1867). Die Lehre von der Elasticitaet und Festigkeit. Prague: H. Dominicus.

(2) Zimmermann, H. (1888). Die Berechnung des Eisenbahnoberbaues. Berlin: Ernst & Korn.

(3) Terzaghi, K. (1955). Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. Geotechnique, 5(4): 297-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297

(4) Rowe, P.W. (1954). A stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with applications to earth pressures at rest and moving walls. Geotechnique, 4(2): 2-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.2.70

(5) Rowe, P.W. (1955). A theoretical and experimental analysis of sheet-pile walls. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 4(1): 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1955.11315

(6) Rowe, P.W. (1956a). The single pile subject to horizontal force. Geotechnique, 6(2): 70-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1956.6.2.70

(7) Rowe, P.W. (1956b). Correspondence on the article «Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction» by K. Terzaghi. Geotechnique, 6(2): 94-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1956.6.2.94

(8) Chadeisson, R. (1961). Parois continues moulées dans le sol. En Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2: 563-568. Paris: Dunod.

(9) Monnet, A. (1994). Module de reaction, coefficient de décompression, au sujet des parameters utilises dans la méthode de calcul élasto-platique des soutènements. Revue Française de Géotechnique, (65): 67-72.

(10) Fages, R. (2010). WRIDO 4.12 User Manual. Miribel: Robert Fages Logiciels.

(11) Anónimo. (2007). Elementos de Contención. Muros Pantalla. Manual de Usuario. Alicante: Cype Ingenieros.

(12) Anónimo. (2002). Plaxis Manual 2D - Version 8. Lisse: A.A. Balkema Publishers.

(13) Haliburton, T.A. (1968). Numerical analysis of flexible retaining structures. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundation Div, 94(SM 6 Proc Paper 6221): 1233-1251.

(14) Oteo, C. (1994). Posibles métodos constructivos para la Infraestructura. En Justo-Alpa-es, J. L. (Ed.) Pasado y futuro del Metro de Sevilla, (pp. 123-151). Sevilla : Universidad de Sevilla. Colección Arquitectura nº 16.

(15) Schmitt, P. (1995). Méthode empirique d'evaluation du coefficient de reaction du sol vis-á-vis des ouvrages de soutènement souples. Revue Francaise de Géotechnique, (71): 3-10.

(16) Bowles, J.E. (1996). Foundation Analysis and Design. New York : McGraw-Hill.

(17) Vesic, A.B. (1961a). Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division- ASCE, 87(2): 35-53.

(18) Vesic, A.B. (1961b). Beams on elastic subgrade and the Winkler's hypothesis. En Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1: 845-850. Paris: Dunod.

(19) Muzás, F. (2002). Consideraciones sobre la elección de Coeficientes de Balasto. Revista de Obras Públicas, 149(3427): 45-51.

(20) Monaco, P., Marchetti, S. (2004). Evaluation of the coefficient of subgrade reaction for design of multi-propped diaphragm walls from DTM moduli. En Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Site Characterization ISC'2, 2: 993-1002. Oporto: Millpress.

(21) Balay, J. (1984). Recommandations pour le Choix des parameters de calcul des écrans de soutènement par la méthode aux modules de réaction (Note d'Information Technique). Paris : Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées.

(22) Ménard, L., Bourdon, G., Houy, A. (1964). Etude expérimentale de l'encastrement d'un rideau en fonction des caractéristiques pressiométriques du sol de fondation. Sols-Soils, (9): 11-27.

(23) Ménard, L., Bourdon, G. (1965). Calcul des rideaux de soutènement. Méthode nouvelle prenant en compte les conditions réelles d'encastrement. Sols-Soils, (12): 18-32.

(24) Simon, B. (1995). Commentaires sur le choix des coefficients de réaction pour le calcul des écrams de soutènement souples. Revue Francaise de Géotechnique, (71): 11-19.

(25) Becci, B., Nova, R. (1987). Un metodo di calcolo automatico peri l progretto di paratie. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica, (21): 33-47.

(26) Muzás, F. (2005). El Coeficiente de Balasto en el cálculo de Pantallas. Revista de Obras Públicas, 152(3459): 33-46.

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

Arozamena, P., Jaramillo, A., & Oteo, C. (2015). Back analysis of the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction from the monitored behaviour of diaphragm walls of Seville’s Underground. Informes De La Construcción, 67(538), e084. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.148

Issue

Section

Research Articles