Visual comfort in office work, temporal factor in Glare evaluation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.67992

Keywords:

Daylight, glare, office work, visual comfort

Abstract


In order to achieve the benefits of daylight to illuminate work spaces, the daylight blocking should be avoided by the potential risk of glare. To achieve an adequate characterization of glare, it is important to consider the perception of the exposure time of the source in the field of vision (Aspect not included in the glare models). In order to determine how this perceptual aspect influences the glare sensation, two scenarios with two types of sunspots on the workplace were evaluated: 1) with greater depth of direct light income and more time in the field of view, 2) with less depth of entry and less time in the field of view. Behavioral parameters, subjective surveys (GSV) and photometric variables (DGP, EV and LR) were measured. The EV was the main explanatory variable (rho = 0.51). Also it was observed a greater tolerance to glare due to the transitory effect of the source.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Pattini, A. (2007). Diseño de artefactos de iluminación natural. La utilización de la energía solar para iluminar espacios interiores (Informe final de proyecto). Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Secretaría de Ciencia, Técnica y Posgrado.

(2) Boyce, P. (2014). Human factors in lighting. 3rd ed. Boca Ratón, Florida: Taylor y Francis Crc Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16707

(3) Villalba, A.M., Pattini, A.E., Córica, M.L. (2012). Análisis de las características morfológicas de las envolventes edilicias y del entorno urbano desde la perspectiva de la iluminación natural. Ambiente Construído, 12(4): 159-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-86212012000400011

(4) DiLaura, D.L., Houser, K.W., Mistrick, R.G., Steffy, G.R. (2010). The lighting handbook: Reference and application. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. New York (NY). https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2010.10732125

(5) Wienold, J. (2009). Daylight Glare in Offices (PhD thesis). Universität Karlsruhe.

(6) Wienold, J., Christoffersen, J. (2006). Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 38(7): 743-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017

(7) Pierson, C., Wienold, J., Bodart, M. (2017). Discomfort glare perception in daylighting: influencing factors. Energy Procedia, 122: 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.332

(8) Pulpitlova, J., Detkova, P. (1993). Impact of the cultural and social background on the visual perception in living and working perception. In Proceedings of the international symposium 'Design of amenity.

(9) Tuaycharoen, N., Tregenza, P.R. (2007). View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research & Technology, 39(2): 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365782807077193

(10) Wang, N., Boubekri, M. (2014). Design recommendations based on cognitive, mood and preference assessments in a sunlit workspace. Lighting Research & Technology, 43(1): 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153510370807

(11) Rodriguez, R.G., Pattini, A. (2012). Tolerance of discomfort glare from a large area source for work on a visual display. Lighting Research & Technology, 46(2): 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153512470386

(12) Yamin Garretón, J., Rodriguez, R.G., Ruiz, A., Pattini, A.E. (2015). Degree of eye opening: A new discomfort glare indicator. Building and Environment, 88: 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.010

(13) Yamin, J.A., Rodriguez, R., Pattini, A. (2015). Effects of perceived indoor temperature on daylight glare perception. Building Research & Information, 44(8): 907-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1103116

(14) Kent, M.G., Altomonte, S., Wilson, R., Tregenza, P.R. (2017). Temporal effects on glare response from daylight. Building and Environment, 113: 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.002

(15) Clear, R.D. (2013). Discomfort glare: What do we actually know?. Lighting Research & Technology, 45(2): 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153512444527

(16) Macfarlane, W. (1974). Habituation. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide.

(17) Kent, M.G., Altomonte, S., Tregenza, P.R., Wilson, R. (2014). Discomfort glare and time of day. Lighting Research & Technology, 47(6): 641-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153514547291

(18) Osterhaus, W.K.E. (1996). Discomfort glare from large area glare sources at computer workstations. In Proceedings for the 1996 International Daylight Workshop, Building with Daylight: Energy-Efficient Design (p. 103-110). Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia.

(19) Osterhaus, W.K.E., Bailey, I.L. (1992). Large area glare sources and their effect on visual discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations. In Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE, vol. II, pp. 1825-1829. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1992.244537

(20) Yamin, J.A., Colombo, E.M., Pattini, A.E. (2018). A global evaluation of discomfort glare metrics in real office spaces with presence of direct sunlight. Energy and Buildings, 166: 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.024

(21) Hopkinson, R.G. (1957). Evaluation of glare. Illuminating Engineering, 52(6): 305-316.

(22) Suk, J.Y., Schiler, M., Kensek, K. (2016). Absolute glare factor and relative glare factor based metric: Predicting and quantifying levels of daylight glare in office space. Energy and Building, 130: 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.021

(23) Inanici, M.N. (2006). Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system. Lighting Research & Technology, 38(2): 123-34. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782806li164oa

(24) Wienold, J. (2015). Evalglare (version v1.22), pp. 1-4.

(25) Kumaragurubaran, V., Inanici, M. (2013). Hdrscope: high dynamic range image processing toolkit for lighting simulations and analysis. In Proceedings of the BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp. 3400-3407.

(26) Rea, M.S. (2000). The IESNA Lighting Handbook: reference & application. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

(27) Iwata, T., Tokura, M. (1998). Examination of the limitations of predicted glare sensation vote (PGSV) as a glare index for a large source Towards a comprehensive development of discomfort glare evaluation. Lighting Research & Technology, 30(2): 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719803000205

(28) Gómez-Gómez, M., Danglot-Banck, C., Vega-Franco, L. (2003). Sinopsis de pruebas estadísticas no paramétricas. Cuándo usarlas. Revista Mexicana de Pediatría, 70(2): 91-99.

(29) Konstantzos, I., Tzempelikos, A., Chan, Y-C. (2015). Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades. Building and Environment, 87: 244-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007

(30) Kobayashi, H., Sato, M. (1992). Physiological responses to illuminance and color temperature of lighting. The Annals of physiological anthropology, 11(1): 45-49. https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.11.45 PMid:1567519

(31) Reinhart, C.F. (2004). Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar energy, 77(1): 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.003

(32) Macfarlane, W. (1970). Habituation. In Progress in Biometeorology. Division A Progress in Human Biometeorology, 1 Pt 1B: 462-467.

Published

2020-03-30

How to Cite

Yamin, J., Pattini, A., & Colombo, E. (2020). Visual comfort in office work, temporal factor in Glare evaluation. Informes De La Construcción, 72(557), e329. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.67992

Issue

Section

Research Articles