Towards a methodology for experimental characterization of mechanical behavior of adobe masonry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.67456Keywords:
Adobe, earthen masonry, compression test, mechanical characterizationAbstract
In the Iberian Peninsula there are numerous houses and heritage sites built with earthen materials. Nowadays, there is also a significant revival of the use of raw earth in modern architecture due to its ecological value and architectural performance. However, there is still a lack of scientific knowledge about its mechanical behavior, as well as specifications for a rigorous characterization. In this paper, an experimental analysis is carried out in order to develop a methodology for the characterization of the adobe masonry as a building material. Methodological issues for obtaining the strain field of the specimens and the choice of the Young module estimators are considered. The mechanical properties of the adobe masonry and the failure mechanisms are analyzed. In the present study, the mechanical behavior of the adobe masonry coming from the Guadalquivir riverbank in Seville (Spain) is specifically studied under compressive loads.
Downloads
References
(1) Blondet, M. (2007, August 15). Behavior of Earthen Buildings. In Pisco Earthquake. Oakland: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
(2) Aguilar, R., Marques, R., Sovero, K., Martel, C., Trujillano, F. y Boroschek, R. (2015). Investigations on the structural behaviour of archaeological heritage in Peru: From survey to seismic assessment. Engineering Structures, 95: 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.058
(3) Blondet, M., Vargas, J., Tarque, N. y Iwaki, C. (2011). Seismic resistant earthen Construction: The contemporary experience at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Informes de la Construcción, 63(523): 41-50. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.017
(4) Che, A., Wu, Z., Sun, J. y Qi, J. (2009, September 8-10). Seismic damage characteristics of rural adobe-wood building in Gansu province induced by the Wenchuan great earthquake. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geoenvironmental Engineering in Hangzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04460-1_111
(5) Solis, M., Torrealva, D., Santillán, P. y Montoya, G. (2015). Análisis del comportamiento a flexión de muros de adobe reforzados con geomalla. Informes de la Construcción, 67(539): e092. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.141 https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.141
(6) Torres Gilles, C. y Jorquera Silva, N. (2018). Técnicas de refuerzo sísmico para la recuperación estructural del patrimonio arquitectónico chileno construido en adobe. Informes de la Construcción, 70(550): e252. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.16.128
(7) Champiré, F., Fabbri, A., Morel, J.-C., Wong, H. y McGregor, F. (2016). Impact of relative humidity on the mechanical behavior of compacted earth as a building material. Construction and Building Materials, 110: 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027
(8) Yetgin, Ş., Çavdar, Ö. y Çavdar, A. (2008). The effects of the fiber contents on the mechanic properties of the adobes. Construction and Building Materials, 22(3): 222-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.022
(9) Sasui, S., Watcharin, J. y Sirimas, H. (2017). Variation in Compressive Strength of Handmade Adobe Brick. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(9): 38-43.
(10) González-Sánchez, B., Rosell Amigó, J.R. y Navarro Ezquerra, A. (2017). Influence of ambient conditions into rammed earth compressive strength (pp. 783-788). In Vernacular and earthen Architecture: Conservation and Sustainability. Leiden (The Netherlands): Crc Press/Balkema. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315267739-123
(11) Varum, H., Costa, A., Fonseca, J. y Furtado, A. (2015). Behaviour Characterization and Rehabilitation of Adobe Construction. Procedia Engineering, 114: 714-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.015
(12) Cid, J., Mazarrón, F.R. y Cañas, I. (2011). Las normativas de construcción con tierra en el mundo. Informes de la Construcción, 63(523): 159-69. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.011
(13) Silveira, D., Varum, H., Costa, A. y Carvalho, J. (2015). Mechanical Properties and Behavior of Traditional Adobe Wall Panels of the Aveiro District. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(9): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001194
(14) Wu, F., Li, G., Li, H.-N. y Jia, J.-Q. (2012). Strength and stress-strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Materials and Structures, 46(9): 1449-1457. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y
(15) Walker, P. (2004). Strength and Erosion Characteristics of Earth Blocks and Earth Block Masonry. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16(5): 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(497)
(16) Reddy, B.V.V., Lal, R. y Rao, K.S.N. (2009). Influence of Joint Thickness and Mortar-Block Elastic Properties on the Strength and Stresses Developed in Soil-Cement Block Masonry. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21(10): 535- 542. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:10(535)
(17) Rodríguez-Mariscal, J.D., Solís, M. y Cifuentes, H. (2018). Methodological issues for the mechanical characterization of unfired earth bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 175: 804-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.118
(18) NZS. (1998). NZS 4298 Materials and workmanship for earth buildings. New Zealand Technical Committe.
(19) Parisi, F., Asprone, D., Fenu, L. y Prota, A. (2015). Experimental characterization of Italian composite adobe bricks reinforced with straw fibers. Composite Structures, 122: 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.060
(20) AENOR-CEN. (1994). UNE 103103:1994. Determinación del límite liquido de un suelo por el método del aparato de casagrande. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR).
(21) AENOR-CEN. (1993). UNE 103104:1993. Determinación del límite plástico de un suelo. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR).
(22) SENCICO. (2017). NTE 0.80 Diseño y construcción con tierra reforzada. Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones. Servicio Nacional de Capacitación para la Industrial de la Construcción (SENCICO).
(23) AENOR-CEN. (1998). UNE-EN 1052-1. Métodos de ensayo para fábricas de albañilería. Parte 1: Determinación de la resistencia a compresión. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR).
(24) AENOR-CEN. (2011). UNE-EN 772-1. Métodos de ensayo de piezas para fábrica de albañilería. Parte 1: Determinación de la resistencia a compresión. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR).
(25) Illampas, R., Ioannou, I. y Charmpis, D.C. (2014). Adobe bricks under compression: Experimental investigation and derivation of stress-strain equation. Construction and Building Materials, 53: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.103
(26) NZS. (1998). NZS 4297 Engineering design of earth buildings. New Zealand Technical Committe.
(27) ASTM. (2010). ASTM E2392-10: Standard guide for design of earthen wall building systems. ASTM International
(28) Aubert, J.E., Fabbri, A., Morel, J.C. y Maillard, P. (2013). An earth block with a compressive strength higher than 45 MPa!. Construction and Building Materials, 47: 366-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.068
(29) Aubert, J.E., Maillard, P., Morel, J.C. y Al Rafii, M. (2016). Towards a simple compressive strength test for earth bricks?. Materials and Structures, 49: 1641-1654. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0601-y https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0601-y
(30) Kaushik, H.B., Rai, D.C. y Jain, S.K. (2007). Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9): 728-39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728)
(31) AENOR-CEN. (1993). UNE 22-950-90, Parte 3. Propiedades mecánicas de las rocas. Ensayos para la determinación de la resistencia. Parte 3: Determinación del módulo de elasticidad (Young). Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación (AENOR).
(32) ASTM. (2004). ASTM E111-04: Standard Test Method for Young's Modulus, Tangent Modulus, and Chord çModulus. ASTM International
(33) Aguilar, R., Montesinos, M. y Uceda, S. (2017). Mechanical characterization of the structural components of Pre-Columbian earthen monuments: Analysis of bricks and mortar from Huaca de la Luna in Perú. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 6: 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2016.11.003
(34) Oliveira, D., Varum, H., Silva, R., Pereira, H., Lourenço, P., y Costa, A. (2007). Caracterização experimental do comportamento diferido de alvenaria de adobe. En V Seminário de Arquitetura em Terra em Portugal, 71-74. Aveiro, Portugal.
(35) Caporale, A., Parisi, F., Asprone, D., Luciano, R. y Prota, A. (2015). Comparative micromechanical assessment of adobe and clay brick masonry assemblages based on experimental data sets. Composite Structures, 120: 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.046
(36) Adorni, E., Coïsson, E. y Ferretti, D. (2013). In situ characterization of archaeological adobe bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 40: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.004
(37) Silveira, D., Varum, H., Costa, A., Martins, T., Pereira, H. y Almeida, J. (2012). Mechanical properties of adobe bricks in ancient constructions. Construction and Building Materials, 28(1): 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.046
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.







