The majolica dome of Santa Maria della Sanità in Naples. Geometric configuration analysis and stability studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.80025Keywords:
Dome, geometric analysis and 3D modeling, masonry domes, equilibrium analysisAbstract
Este artículo examina el proceso de medición, la ejecución de levantamientos y la representación de la cúpula de Santa Maria della Sanità en Nápoles (Italia). El estudio produjo un análisis geométrico de la configuración espacial de la cúpula, el diseño de su decoración de mayólica y el estudio de su comportamiento estructural. Los objetivos generales de esta investigación pueden resumirse brevemente como sigue. En primer lugar, la investigación se centra en la definición de la geometría correcta de la cúpula obtenida mediante levantamientos detallados. Por último, el presente trabajo realiza un análisis estructural simplificado del conjunto cúpula-sistema de contrarresto dentro del marco teórico del Análisis Límite a través de la estática gráfica.
Downloads
References
(1) Buccaro, A. (1991). Il borgo dei Vergini. Storia e struttura di un ambito urbano. Napoli: CUEN.
(2) Venditti, A. (1970). Fra' Nuvolo e l'architettura napoletana tra Cinque e Seicento. In P. F. Palumbo (Ed.), Barocco europeo, barocco italiano, barocco salentino. Relazioni e comunicazioni presentate al Congresso internazionale sul barocco, Lecce e Terra d'Otranto (pp. 195-248). Lecce.
(3) Nicolella, D. (1997). Le cupole di Napoli. Edizioni Scientifiche italiane spa.
(4) Vasari, M. G. (1568). Le vite de' più eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori (pp. 308-311). Firenze.
(5) Minervini, M. T. (2013). Il restauro della cupola maiolicata di Santa Maria della Sanità. Napoli: M. D'Auria Editore.
(6) Migliari, R. (2009). Geometria descrittiva. Metodi e costruzioni. Milano: CittàStudi.
(7) Migliari, R. (2003). Geometria dei modelli. Rappresentazione grafica e informatica per l'architettura e per il design. Roma: Kappa Edizioni.
(8) Rossi, A. (2014). The ethos suggested by landscape markers: the tiled dome. Domes and cupolas, an International Journal for Architecture, Engineering, conservation and Culture, vol. 1, n. 1. 2014, p. 85-91. Firenze: Angelo Pontecorboli editore.
(9) Docci, M., Maestri, D.: Il rilevamento architettonico. Storia, metodi e disegno. Laterza, Roma-Bari (1984).
(10) Giordano, A. (1999). Cupole, volte e altre superfici. La genesi e la forma. Torino: UTET.
(11) Spallone, R. (2019). Geometry of vaulted system in the treatises by Guarino Guarini. EGE - Revista de Expresión Gráfica en la Edificación, n. 11, 2019. ISSN: 2605-082X https://doi.org/10.4995/ege.2019.12872
(12) De Rubertis, R. editor: Dossier rilievo. XY dimensioni del disegno. 17-18-19 (1993).
(13) Zerlenga, O., Cirillo, V. (2018). Curves and Surfaces in the churches with ovate plant in Naples. geometric analogies and differences. In L. Cocchiarella (Ed.), ICGG 2018- Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics. Vol. 809, pp. 514-525, BERLIN: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95588-9_42
(14) Capone, M., Lanzara, E. (2019). 3D data interpretation using treatises geometric rules to built coffered domes. ISPRS. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., Vol. XLII-2/W15, pp. 231 - 238. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-231-2019
(15) Penta, I. (1999). Gli embrici maiolicati. In A. Baculo, A., di Luggo, A. e Florio, R. (Eds.), Napoli versus coelum. La città e le sue cupole. Napoli: Electa.
(16) Zerlenga, O. (2008). Rappresentazione geometrica e gestione informatica dei modelli. Disegno ornamentale_Intersezione di superfici. Napoli: La scuola di Pitagora editrice.
(17) Kooharian, A. (1952). Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 24(4).
(18) Heyman, J. (1966). The stone skeleton. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2(2), 249-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7
(19) Huerta, S. (2008). The analysis of masonry architecture: A historical approach. Architectural Science Review, 51(4), 297-328. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5136
(20) Huerta, S. (2004). Arcos bóvedas y cúpulas. Geometría y equilibrio en el cálculo tradicional de estructuras de fábrica. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera.
(21) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C. & Guerriero, L. (2017). The slicing technique for the evaluation of the formal efficiency: a comparative study. In Proceedings of the XXIII Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (pp. 1500-1511). Mediglia (MI): Gechi Edizioni, Salerno.
(22) Roca, P., Cervera, M., Gariup, G., & Pela, L. 2010. Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 17(3), 299-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1
(23) Block, P. Dejong, M. & Ochsendorf, J. (2006). As Hangs the Flexible Line: Equilibrium of Masonry Arches. The Nexus Network Journal, 8(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-006-0015-9
(24) Poleni, G. (1748). Memorie istoriche della Gran Cupola del Tempio Vaticano. Padua: Nella Stamperia del Seminario.
(25) Rubió i Bellver, J. (1912). Conferencia acerca de l0s conceptos orgánicos, mecánicos y constructivos de la Catedral de Mallorca. Anuario de la Asociación de Arquitectos de Catalunia (pp.87-140).
(26) Huerta, S. (2006). Structural Design in the Work of Gaudí. Architectural Science Review, (49)4. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2006.4943
(27) Ferrero, C., Cusano, C., Dell'Endice, A., Yavuzer, M. N., Wu, Y. X. & Iannuzzo, A. (2020). When cracks are (not) a structural concern: the case study of "Giovanni Vinciguerra" school in Anagni. In: Proceedings of the SAHC Symposium, Barcelona.
(28) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C. & Angelillo, M. (2019). A limit analysis approach for masonry domes: the basilica of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation, 4,227-242. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2019.100568
(29) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C. & Angelillo, M. (2019). Stability Analysis and Seismic Vulnerability of Large Masonry Domes. MI - Masonry International, (32)2.
(30) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C. & Angelillo, M. (2018). Seismic vulnerability of domes: a case study. Journal Of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 13,679-689. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2018.13.679
(31) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., Angelillo, M. & Fortunato, A. (2018). A study on form and seismic vulnerability of the Dome of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. Ingegneria Sismica, 35, 88-108.
(32) Huerta, S. (2013). Ethics and materials: Some Spanish Case Studies. Déontologie de la pierre. Stratégies d'intervention pour la cathédrale de Lausanne. Lausanne.
(33) Huerta, S. (2008). The analysis of masonry architecture: A historical approach. Architectural Science Review, 51(4), 297. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5136
(34) Cennamo, C. & Cusano, C. (2018). The gothic arcade of Santa Maria Incoronata in Naples. Equilibrium of gothic arches. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation, 3,92-107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2018.10013662
(35) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., & Di Santo, D. (2019). Stability of the Abbey of San Lorenzo ad Septimum cloister in Aversa. In Carmine Gambardella (ed), Proceedings of the XVII International Forum Le vie dei Mercanti, Architecture, Heritage and Design. World Heritage and Legacy. Rome: Gangemi Editor International Publishing.
(36) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., & Angelillo, M. (2018). On the statics of large domes: a static and kinematic approach for San Francesco di Paola in Naples. In Proceedings of the British Masonry Society (pp. 504-517). Milan: The International Masonry Society (IMS).
(37) Cennamo, C., Cusano, C., & Angelillo, M. (2017). The Neoclassical Dome of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. A study on form and stability. In Proceedings of the XXIII Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (pp. 1500-1511). Mediglia (MI): Gechi Edizioni, Salerno.
(38) Fuentes González, P., Huerta, S. (2016). Geometry, Construction and Structural Analysis of the Crossed-Arch Vault of the Chapel of Villaviciosa, in the Mosque of Córdoba. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 10(5):150506103629008. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1025456
(39) Huerta, S., Fuentes González, P. (2010). Analysis and Demolition of Some Vaults of the Church of La Peregrina in Sahagun (Spain). Advanced Materials Research, 133-134. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.343
(40) López Manzanares, G. (1998). Estabilidad y construcción de cúpulas de fábrica: el nacimiento de la teoría y su relación con la práctica, Tesis Doctoral, ETS de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
(41) Cennamo, C. & Di Fiore, M. (2013). Best practice of structural retrofit: the SS. Rosario Church in Gesualdo, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, (4)2,215-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2010-0049
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
