Innovative cooperation processes: analysis and potential of Living Labs networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/id.55071Keywords:
living lab, network, cooperation, innovation and development, cross-border networkAbstract
International cooperation is an intrinsic component of the processes of innovation and development. Besides a model of cooperation, networks are an organizational model for institutional strengthening, for the articulation of national innovation systems and for the internationalization of them. Likewise, during the last 10 years there has been an increase of Living Labs linked to innovation in Europe. They are forming a growing community channeled through the European Network of Living Labs. The existing networks have been analyzed with the aim of knowing the state of the art and the future needs of the networks of Living Labs. The main objective is the exchange of best practices and lessons learned. The harmonization and integration of tools and methods among the partners is other cooperation objective. Finally, a third objective is to develop a larger scale research among the partners of the different laboratories. It is required a greater organizational structure to achieve collaborative and research results at a higher scale, the networks are still young.
Downloads
References
(1) Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of co-operation: managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. Oxford University Press.
(2) Zander, I. (1999). How do you mean global? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation. Research Polcy, Vol. 28, 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00113-9
(3) Gómez, L., Fernández, M., & Sebastián, J. (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, Vol. 44 Nº 3, 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458489
(4) Albornoz, M., & Estébanez, M. E. (1998). What do we mean by networking? Selected Latin American experiences in cooperatiion. En New approaches to science and technology cooperation and capacity building. Ginebra: UNCTAD.
(5) Sebastián, J. (1998). La experiencia europea en redes de cooperación. En Ciencia y Desarrollo: la ciencia en la integración latinoamericana (págs. 156-159). México: CONACYT.
(6) Sebastián, J. (2000). Las redes de cooperación como modelo organizativo y funcional para la i+d. En Redes, Vol.7 Nº 15 (págs. 97-111). Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
(7) Lievens, B., Schaffers, H., Turkama, P., Stahlbröst, A., & Ballon, P. (2011). Cross Border Living Labs Networks to Support SMEs Accessing New Markets. eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings. Florence: IIMC International Information Management Corporation.
(8) Living Lab Portfolio Leadership Group. (s.f.). Living Lab Roadmap 2007-2010. Recuperado el 1 de July de 2011, de http://www.tssg.org/archives/2007/03/corelabs.html
(9) Mavridis, A., Molinari, F., Vontas, A., & Crehan, P. (1-3 de June de 2009). A practical model for the study of living labs complex environment. Digital Ecosystems and Technologies 2009. 3rd International Conference on Digitals and Technologies.
(10) Dutilleul, B., Birrer, F., & Mensink, W. (2010). Unpacking European Living Labs: Analysing Innovation's Social Dimensions. En Central European Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 4 Nº 1 (págs. 60-85).
(11) Koschatzky, K. (2002). Fundamentos de la economía de redes. Especial enfoque hacia la innovación. En Economía industrial Nº 346 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Economía de la innovación: redes, cooperación y cambio tecnológico) (págs. 15-26).
(12) (2008). Methods and Tools for Collaborative Networked Organizations. En L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus. Springer.
(13) Fritsch, M. (2001). Innovation by Networking:An Economic Perspective. En K. Koschatzky, M. Kulicke, & A. Zenker, Innovation Networks. Concepts and Challenges in the European Perspective (págs. 25-34). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
(14) Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Networks Forms of Organization. En L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw, Research in Organizational Behavior (págs. 295-336). Greenwich: JAI Press.
(15) Domrös, C. (1994). Innovationen und Institutionen: eine transaktionskostenökonomische Analyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung strategischer Allianzen. Berlín: Duncker & Humblot.
(16) Staber, U. H. (1996). Networks and Regional Development: Perspectives and Unresolved Issues. En U. H. Staber, N. V. Schaefer, & B. Sharma, Business Networks. Prospects für Regional Development (págs. 1-23). Berlín: Walter de Gruyter.
(17) Sydow, J. (1996). Flexible Speciailzation in Regional Networks. En U. H. Staber, N. V. Schaefer, & B. Sharma, Business Networks. Prospects für Regional Development (págs. 24-40). Berlín: Walter de Gruyter.
(18) Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
(19) Granovetter, M. (1982). The Strength of Weak Ties. A Network Theory Revisited. En P. V. Marsden, & N. Lin, Social Structure and Network Analysis (págs. 105-130). Beverly Hills: Sage.
(20) Fundación EOI. (2006). Necesidades futuras para la dinamización de redes empresariales horizontales.
(21) Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2009). Contributions of Living Labs in Reducing Market Based Risk. International Conference on Concurrent Enterprise - IEEE, IFIP/IFAP. Leiden, The Netherlands.
(22) Bertoldi, F., Schaffers, H., Ruland, R., Schoepfer, E., Rossi, A., & Fusco, L. (2008). Stimulating Innovation in the Frascati Living Lab through Supporting Business Incubation, Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. En P. Cunningham, & M. Cunningham. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
(23) European Commission. (2008). Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP). Obtenido de ICT Policy Support Work Programme 2009: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/ict_psp/docume/ICT%20 PSP%20WP2009%20-%20v21nov08.pdf
(24) Apollon Project. (s.f.). D1.1 A Catalogue of state-of-the-art concepts, existing tools and lessons learned for cross-border Living Lab network. Obtenido de www.apollon-pilot.eu
(25) European Network of Living Labs. (February de 2013). ENoLL. Obtenido de http://www.openlivinglabs.eu
(26) Vérilhac, I., Pallot, M., & Aragall, F. (2012). IDeALL: Exploring the way to integrate design for all within living labs. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising ICE 2012. Munich.
(27) Tecnologías para la Salud y el Bienestar (TSB) (s.f.). Recuperado en diciembre de 2016, de Universitat Politécnica de València: http://www.tsb.upv.es/ubicuitics/index.php?p=category%2Fconcurso-de-ideas&paged=38
(28) Australian Living Labs Innovation Network. (s.f.). Recuperado en diciembre de 2016, de (ALLIN): https://openlivinglabs. net.au/
(29) Wu, H.-Y. (2012). An Empirical Study of UK Living Labs. National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Business Administration. International Association for Management of Technology. IAMOT 2012 Proceedings.
(30) Laurea University of Applied Sciences. (s.f.). Recuperado en enero de 2017, de Laurea Living Labs: https://www.laurea.fi/en/research-development-and-innovations/laurea-living-labs
(31) LILAN. A nordic-baltic research and innovation programme on living labs. (24 de Abril de 2009). Programme Description.
(32) Luleå Tekniska Universitet. (s.f.). Recuperado en enero de 2017, de Open Living Labs Sweden: http://www.ltu.se/centres/cdt/Botnia-Living-Lab/Avslutade-projekt/Digital-innovation/Open-Living-Labs-Sweden-1.107885?l=en
(33) De Oliveira , Á., & Amaral de Brito, D. (Mayo de 2013). Living Labs: A experiência Portuguesa. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad, 8(23), 201-229.
(34) Citilab. (23 de noviembre de 2007). citilab. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de http://www.citilab.eu/es/que-esta-pasando/noticias/archivo/presentacion-de-la-red-catalana-de-living-labs
(35) Collado, T. (3 de febrero de 2016). idigital. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de Generalitat de Catalunya: http://www.idigital.cat/web/i-digital/coneixement/experiencies/detall/-/asset_publisher/Dcb0/content/entrevista_artur_serraels-living-labs-poden-ser-les-institucions-amb-mes-futur
(36) Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Governació i Administracions Públiques. Secretaria de Telecomunicacions i Societat de la informació. (Octubre de 2007). Projecte per a la creació de la Xarxa Catalana de Living Labs. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de http://es.slideshare.net/stsiweb/catlba-xarxa-catalana-de-living-labs
(37) Georgopoulos, P. (27 de abril de 2009). Presentación at MedLab Kick-off Meeting. MEDLAB Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. Thessaloniki, Grecia. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de Centro di Monitoraggio GIZC: http://www.cmgizc.info/documenti/002_MEDLAB/Presentaz_Salonicco/presentation%20of%20medlab%20project.pdf
(38) MEDLAB: Mediterranean Living Lab for Territorial Innovation. (Diciembre de 2010). Deliverable 2.4.1 Policy integration for a Mediterranean Living Lab. Thessaloniki. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de http://www.intelspace.eu wpcontent/ uploads/2010/09/2.4.1-policy-integration-en-v1.pdf
(39) Finish Network of Living Labs. (s.f.). Recuperado en enero de 2017, de https://fnoll.wordpress.com/
(40) INRIA: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique. (25 de junio de 2012). Recuperado en diciembre de 2016, de https://www.inria.fr/actualite/mediacenter/creation-de-l-association-france-living-labs
(41) ENERGY ViLLab. (s.f.). Recuperado en enero de 2017, de Living Lab for sustainable development: http://www.energyvillab. net/kick-off-meeting-of-the-italian-network-of-living-labs-inoll/
(42) Inoll: Italian network of Living Labs. (s.f.). Inoll: Italian network of Living Labs. Recuperado en enero de 2017, de http://slideplayer.com/slide/10685403/
(43) Climate KIC. (2015). Building Technologies Accelerator. Obtenido de BTA Brochure: http://bta.climate-kic.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2015/11/BTA-Brochure.pdf
(44) Mateo, C., Navarro, M., Peiró, J. M., & Kozusznik, M. (2014). Building Technologies Accelerator as a co-creation living laboratory concept. CONAMA. Congreso Nacional del Medio Ambiente.
(45) Schaffers, H., & Turkama, P. (2012). Living labs for cross-border systemic innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 25-30.
(46) Maula, M., Keil, T., & Salmenkaita, J. (2006). Open innovation in systemic innovation contexts. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West, Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (págs. 241-257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(47) Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&d Management, Vol. 36 Nº 3, 223-228.
(48) Aho, E., Brunila, A., Eriksson, J.-T., Harjunen, P., Heikinheimo, R., Karjalainen, S., . . . Toivanen, H. (2008). The Proposal for Finland's National Innovation Strategy. The Finnish Ministry of Employment and Economy.
(49) Serra, A. (2013). Tres problemas sobre los living labs/laboratorios ciudadanos: una mirada desde Europa. Revista CTS, Vol. 8 Nº 23, 283-298.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
