Análisis del comportamiento sísmico de los edificios de obra de fábrica, típicos del distrito Eixample de Barcelona

R. Moreno-González; J. M. Bairán

doi:10.3989/ic.10.045

Authors

R. Moreno-González Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña
J. M. Bairán Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.045

Keywords:

Masonry, Vulnerability, Fragility, Capacity, Seismic damage

Abstract

In this work a study about the vulnerability and seismic risk of the unreinforced masonry buildings, widely, existent in the Eixample district of Barcelona, Spain, is carried out. The buildings, here, analyzed are real and detailed structural drawings and reports have been used to model them. The seismic risk is evaluated by means of a mechanical model, based in the Capacity Spectrum Method. The seismic demand is described by elastic response spectrum defined by the Eurocode-8. Fragility curves are obtained from a nonlinear analysis, considering the capacity spectra. Expected seismic damage is gotten with the damage probability matrices. The analysis of the buildings has been performed by TreMuri program by means of a macro-element model. The results shown a considerable vulnerability in this type of buildings, therefore, in spite of the seismic hazard, the expected seismic risk is significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Infocca: “Funcions d’informació de Barcelona i Cartografia”. Informe interno, Institut Municipal d’Informàtica (IMI), Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, (1992).

(2) Milutinovic Z. V.; Trendafiloski G. S.: “Vulnerability of current buildings. WP-4 Report”. Work Package 4 of Risk-UE Project, European Commission, EVK4-CT-2000-00014. (2003).

(3) Moreno R.; Lantada N.; Bonett R.; Pujades L. and Barbat A.: “WP4: Vulnerability assessment of current buildings. Capacity and fragility of the Barcelona’s residential buildings”. Report by CIMNE Working Group to Risk-UE project, Barcelona, (2003).

(4) NCSE-02: Normativa “Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente: Parte General y Edificación”, Real Decreto 997/2002, Boletín Oficial del Estado: 244, Madrid, (2002).

(5) EC-8: Eurocode 8: “Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings”. Comité Européen de Normalisation. EN 1998-1:2004, CEN Brussels, December, (2004), 229 pp.

(6) Galasco, A.; Lagomarsino, S.; Penna, A.: “TREMURI Program: Seismic Analyzer of 3D Masonry Buildings”. Technical Report, Universitat degli Studi di Genova, Italia, (2002).

(7) Cerdà, I.: Teoría General de la Urbanización. Reforma y Ensanche de Barcelona. Reedición: Instituto de estudios fiscales, Barcelona, (1968).

(8) García Espuche, A.: El quadrat d’or. Centre de la Barcelona modernista. La formació d’un espai urbà privilegiat. Olimpiada cultural Barcelona’92. Lunwerg Editores, 315 pp. (1990).

(9) Paricio, A.: Secrects d’un sistema constructiu: l’Eixample. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña. Ediciones UPC, Barcelona, (2001).

(10) Marí, A.; Alegre, V.; Gens, A.; Roca, P. et al.: Estudio preliminar sobre los posibles efectos de la construcción de un túnel para el tren de alta velocidad bajo los edificios situados entre las calles Mallorca, Valencia, Lepanto y Cartagena. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, España, (2003).

(11) Gambarotta, L.; Lagomarsino, S.: “Damage model for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: the continuum model and its applications”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, (1997), pp. 441-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199704)26:4<441::AID-EQE651>3.0.CO;2-0

(12) Penna, A.: “A macro-element procedure for the non-linear dynamic analysis of masonry buildings”. Tesis Doctoral, Politecnico di Milano, Italia, (2002).

(13) Galasco, A.; Lagomarsino, S.; Penna, A.; Resemini, S.: “Non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings”. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper 843, Vancouver, Canadá, (2004).

(14) Yépez, F.: “Metodología para la evaluación de la vulnerabilidad y riesgo sísmico de estructuras aplicando técnicas de simulación”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, España, (1996).

(15) Moreno, R.: “Evaluación del riesgo sísmico en edificios mediante análisis estático no lineal: Aplicación a diversos escenarios sísmicos de Barcelona”. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, España, (2006).

(16) ATC-40: “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”. Applied Technology Council, Report: SSC 96-01, volume 1, Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, California, (1996).

(17) HAZUS 99-SR2: “HAZUS Technical Manual”. Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA & National Institute of Building Sciences, NIBS, Washington D.C.; vols. 1, 2, 3, (2002).

(18) Barbat, A. H.; Pujades, L.G.; Lantada N.; Moreno R.: “Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using a capacity spectrum based method: Application to Barcelona.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28, 10–11, (2008), pp. 851–865. Erratum: Volume 30, 8 (2010), pp. 767.

(19) Gru.nthal, G.: “European Macroseismic Scale 1998”. Centre Européen de Géodynamique et Séismologie, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Volume 15, Luxemburg, (1998).

(20) Moreno González, R.; Bairán García, J.M. y Rodas Aldana, W.A.: “Vulnerabilidad sísmica en edificios metálicos”. Hormigón y Acero, 62, 261, 69-80, (2011).