The synergy between structural design and fluid dynamics: the case of the cycle track of Medellin, in Colombia

Authors

  • C. Muñoz Blanc

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.15.059

Keywords:

Aerodynamic analysis, fluid dynamics, structural design, wind loads, drag and lift forces

Abstract


This paper presents the advantages that the performance determination of wind actions from methods based in computational fluid dynamics has in the structural design of buildings with tapered or complex geometry. The analysis of the wind flow behaviour in lighter and more ethereal architectural and structural designs by means of advanced simulation tools, that use a wide theoretical ground based in fluid dynamics and continuum, has made possible to minimise the impact of wind loads in the size of the main structural elements. This paper shows the work methodologies that have allowed to optimize the main structure of the new Cycle track of Medellin, in Colombia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Brufau i Niubó, R. (2006). La rueda de bicicleta como modelo estructural. Quaderns d'Arquitectura i Urbanisme, 250: 86-91.

(2) Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente. NSR-10. Título B – Cargas. Capítulo B.6 – Fuerzas de viento.

(3) Streeter, V., Wylie, B. (1988). Parte 1. Capítulo 6: Flujos externos. Mecánica de Fluidos, 8.ª edición, pp. 247-261. McGraw Hill.

(4) Garrick, L. E. (1976). Aeroelasticity-Frontiers and Beyond. 13.ª Conferencia Von Karman. Journal of Aircraft, 13(9): 641-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.58696

(5) Li-án, A. (2000). La mecánica de fluidos en los albores del siglo xx. Discurso inaugural del a-o académico 2000-2001. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 94(4): 535-552.

(6) Millán, G. (1978). La resolución numérica de los problemas aerodinámicos. Discurso inaugural del a-o académico 1978-1979. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales.

(7) Samy, M., Mofreh, H. (2009). A Comparative Study of Turbulence Models Performance for Turbulent Flow in a Planar Asymmetric Diffuser. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 53.

(8) Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, 32: 1598-1605. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

(9) Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., Langtry, R. (2003). Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST turbulence Model. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4.

(10) http://aiaa-dpw.larc.nasa.gov/Workshop2/workshop2.html (2003).

(11) Launcher, B. E., Spalding, D. B. (1974). The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3: 269-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2

(12) Balestrin, E., Luciano, R. D., Noriler, D., Decker, R. K., Meier, H. F. (2015). Sensibility Study of the Reynolds Stress Model Parameters for Swirling Flows in Cyclones. Chemical Engineering Transactions. AIDIC, 43: 1159-1164.

(13) Pope, S. B. (2000). Parte II: Modelling and Simulation, Cap. 11.7: Near Wall treatments. Turbulence flows, pp. 442-444. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(14) Sadraey, M. (2009). Cap. 3. Drag Force and Drag Coefficient. Aircraft Performance analysis. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Muñoz Blanc, C. (2016). The synergy between structural design and fluid dynamics: the case of the cycle track of Medellin, in Colombia. Informes De La Construcción, 68(542), e146. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.15.059

Issue

Section

Research Articles