Characterisation of Façades: Classification of the Constructive Typologies most frequently used in Spain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.88694

Keywords:

lesions, inspection and diagnosis, sustainable management, building database, maintenance, refurbishment, digital building logbook

Abstract


The lack of information concerning the building stock is one of the factors hindering its sustainable management. With the aim of promoting a proper preservation and renovation of existing buildings, our work addresses the challenge of improving the knowledge on these buildings, by focusing on their façades. This article presents the development of a collection of sheets, with key data related to the construction systems of façades, to characterize the most common constructive typologies found in the Spanish building stock. The collection of sheets gathers technical information about those systems in a systematic way, with data related to their features, most common lesions, and improvement capacity. Designed for their further adaptation into a digital format that contributes to developing holistic and interoperable databases using BIM, the classification sheets are manageable, and adaptable, properties that make it applicable to facilitate the inspection and diagnosis of existing buildings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Economidou, M.; Atanasiu, B.; Despret, C.; Maio, J.; Nolte, I.; Rapf, O.; Laustsen, J.; Ruyssevelt, P.; Staniaszek, D.; Strong, D. (2011). Europe's buildings under the microscope (BPIE ed.). Recuperado de https://bpie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/HR_EU_B_under_microscope_study.pdf

(2) Ardente, F.; Beccali, M.; Cellura, M.; Mistretta, M. (2011). Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.022

(3) Ferreira, J.; Pinheiro, M.D.; Brito, J.D. (2013). Refurbishment decision support tools review-Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects. Energy Policy, 62, 1453-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.082

(4) Jensen, P.; Maslesa, E.; Brinkø Berg, J. (2018). Sustainable Building Renovation: Proposals for a Research Agenda. Sustainability, 10(12), 4677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124677

(5) Volt, J.; Dorizas, V. (2018). Policy innovation for building renovation. Recuperado de http://bpie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/BPIX-Briefing-_Final-1.pdf.

(6) Instituto Valenciano de la Edificación, (IVE) (2011). Catálogo de Soluciones Constructivas de Rehabilitación. Recuperado de https://www.five.es/tienda-ive/catalogo-de-soluciones-constructivas-de-rehabilitacion/.

(7) Monjo Carrió, J. (2007). Durabilidad vs Vulnerabilidad. Informes de la Construcción, 59(507), 43-58. Recuperado de http://informesdelaconstruccion.revistas.csic.es/index.php/informesdelaconstruccion/article/view/531/606. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.2007.v59.i507.531

(8) Konstantinou, T.; Knaack, U. (2013). An approach to integrate energy efficiency upgrade into refurbishment design process, applied in two case-study buildings in Northern European climate. Energy & Buildings, 59, 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.023

(9) ISO. (2019). ISO 15392:2019 Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works - General principles. ISO/TC 59/SC 17

(10) Ortega, L.; Serrano-Lanzarote, B.; Fran-Bretones, J.Mª. (2015). Identificación de procesos patológicos más frecuentes en fachadas y cubiertas en España a partir del método Delphi. Informes de la Construcción, 67(537). https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.13.144

(11) Alkhatib, H.; Lemarchand, P.; Norton, B.; O'Sullivan, D.T.J. (2020). Deployment and control of adaptive building facades for energy generation, thermal insulation, ventilation and daylighting: A review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 185, 116331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116331

(12) Häkkinen, T. (2012). Systematic method for the sustainability analysis of refurbishment concepts of exterior walls. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 783-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.084

(13) ISO. (2011). ISO 15686-1:2011. Buildings and constructed assets. Service life planning. Part 1: General principles and framework. ISO/TC 59/SC 14.

(14) Volt, J.; Zuhaib, S.; Schmatzberger, S.; Toth, Z. (2020). Energy Performance Certificates- Assessing their status and potential. Recuperado de https://www.bpie.eu/publication/energy-performance-certificates-in-europe-assessing-their-status-and-potential/.

(15) European Commission. (2020). Definition of the digital building logbook. Recuperado dehttps://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cacf9ee6-06ba-11eb-a511-01aa75ed71a1

(16) Instituto de Ciencias de la Construcción Eduardo Torroja. CSIC. (2020). Código Técnico de la Edificación. CTE. Recuperado de https://www.codigotecnico.org.

(17) Ornelas, C.; Guedes, J.M.; Breda-Vázquez, I. (2016). The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage. Taylor & Francis Group. Recuperado de https://hdl.handle.net/10216/117631. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21889-88

(18) ROBIM (2017). ROBÓTICA AUTÓNOMA PARA INSPECCIÓN Y EVALUACIÓN DE EDIFICIOS EXISTENTES CON INTEGRACIÓN BIM. Recuperado de http://www.robim.es/

(19) Valencia Institute of Building (IVE) (2018). Benefits of BIM and its level of adoption in European countries. Build Up. Recuperado de http://www.buildup.eu/en/node/56441.

(20) European Commission. (2020). Circular economy - Principles for buildings design. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/39984.

(21) Ornelas, C.; Miranda Guedes, J.; Sousa, F.; Breda-Vázquez, I. (2020). Supporting Residential Built Heritage Rehabilitation through an Integrated Assessment. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1712496

(22) Sesana, M.M.; Rivallain, M.; Salvalai, G. (2020). Overview of the Available Knowledge for the Data Model Definition of a Building Renovation Passport for Non-Residential Buildings: The ALDREN Project Experience. Sustainability, 12(2), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020642

(23) European Commission (2021). EU Building Stock Observatory. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/eu-bso_en.

(24) Instituto Nacional de Estadística, (INE). (2021). INEbase. Industria, energía y construcción. Recuperado de https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/categoria.htm?c=Estadistica_P&cid=1254735576757.

(25) Resolución del Consejo de 12 de febrero de 2001 sobre la calidad arquitectónica en el entorno urbano y rural (2001/C 73/04), (2001). Recuperado de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001G0306(03)&from=ES.

(26) TABULA (2016). National Building Typologies. Recuperado de https://episcope.eu/building-typology/.

(27) Cuerda, E.; Pérez, M.; Neila, J. (2014). Facade typologies as a tool for selecting refurbishment measures for the Spanish residential building stock. Energy and Buildings, 76, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.054

(28) Instituto de Tecnología de la Contrucción de Cataluña (ITeC) (2011). Ministerio de Fomento. Catálogo de Elementos Constructivos del CTE. Recuperado de https://itec.cat/cec/Pages/BusquedaSC.aspx.

(29) EFINOVATIC, Centro Nacional de Energías Renovables (CENER) (2015). Manual de usuario de calificación energética de edificios existentes CE3X. Recuperado de https://certific.es/descargar-ce3x-version-2.1.html.

(30) European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document. Impact assessment. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_en_impact_assessment_part1_v3.pdf.

(31) Maslesa, E.; Jensen, P.A.; Birkved, M. (2018). Indicators for quantifying environmental building performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 19, 552-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.006

(32) Ferraz, G.T.; de Brito, J.; de Freitas, V.P.; Silvestre, J.D. (2016). State-of-the-Art Review of Building Inspection Systems. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(5), 4016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000839

(33) Bortolini, R.; Forcada, N. (2020). Operational Performance Indicators and Causality Analysis for Non-Residential Buildings. Informes de la Construcción, 72(557), 333. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.67792

(34) Ma, Z.; Cooper, P.; Daly, D.; Ledo, L. (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55, 889-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018

(35) Jiménez-Pulido, C.; Jiménez-Rivero, A.; García-Navarro, J. (2020). Sustainable management of the building stock: A Delphi study as a decision-support tool for improved inspections. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102184

(36) Rubio de Val, J. (2015). Potencial del nuevo marco normativo para el impulso de la rehabilitación y la regeneración urbana en los ámbitos autonómico y local. Informes de la Construcción, 67 (Extra-1), m023. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.14.072

(37) de Santoli, L. (2015). Guidelines on energy efficiency of cultural heritage. Energy and Buildings, 86, 534-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.050

(38) EuroACE (2018). A guide to the implementation of the amended Energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD) 2018. Recuperado de https://euroace.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/EuroACE-Guide-to-EPBD-Implementation-web-version.pdf.

(39) Nielsen, A.N.; Jensen, R.L.; Larsen, T.S.; Nissen, S.B. (2016). Early stage decision support for sustainable building renovation - A review. Building and Environment, 103, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.009

Published

2022-12-12

How to Cite

Jiménez-Pulido, C. ., Jiménez-Rivero, A. ., & García-Navarro, J. . (2022). Characterisation of Façades: Classification of the Constructive Typologies most frequently used in Spain. Informes De La Construcción, 74(568), e471. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.88694

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Funding data